Click on all pictures for larger.
After numerous restless evenings of consultation, it was the ideal opportunity for a change. I sold my Lange 1815 to account for something new in the assortment. What might it be? After much chasing and poring over lists and visiting sellers, I settled on a Reverso Grande GMT (RGGMT from here on) in steel. The standard gator lash wasn’t truly adaptable or comfortable for me, and left the watch sitting high, so I went for the wristband model.
That was in mid 2009. Two and a piece a very long time on, am I still in love?
Let’s back up a bit. There are three things that can happen to a watch after you’ve claimed it for some time: possibly it develops on you, you like it however much you did initially, or you become exhausted of it and can’t help thinking about what in heaven’s name had you to purchase the damn thing in any case. The 1815 was one of the previous classification. Living with it for a very long time just reaffirmed how much idea and refinement went into the plan and execution of the watch. Would the RGGMT be the same?
The RGGMT offers fabulous value for the money. In addition to the fact that you get an inhouse, formed development (the Cal. 878 with 276 sections), it has a valuable complication – second timezone on a different dial, settable by +/ – pushers; it runs for eight days and presentations remaining force hold; day/night for the two timezones; subseconds; GMT counterbalance of second timezone; lastly, a major date show. JLC likewise put them through their 1000 hour ‘Expert Control’ timing and guideline test, which is clear in how well it keeps time. Goodness, and it’s adequately two watches in one, in light of the altogether different dials. What more could you ask for?
Actually, a watch that shows both timezones on one face with a subsequent hour hand is a lot simpler to peruse. Furthermore, one that puts the force save as an afterthought which will be straight up when the crown faces your winding hand (the RGGMT shows it on the back dial, which implies you need to wind the watch topsy turvy or ungracefully with your left hand) would be pleasant. Furthermore, for the most part I realize whether it’s day or night, so those pointers aren’t by and large that valuable. I likewise found the second timezone very pointless when venturing out to Nepal, which has a 5h brief GMT balance (to be reasonable, however, practically all GMT watches would have this issue). There’s likewise the little matter of the case being made of steel so delicate that you should simply just glance at it to actuate a scratch. Gracious, and the wristband is made of a similar material, too.
With all that analysis, you’d think I lament my buy. Despite what might be expected; it’s really an exceptionally fulfilling watch to claim – I simply don’t utilize it the manner in which the creators planned. Both of my dials show the equivalent timezone. The silver guilloche dial, with its blue hands and field of stars on the night part of the day/night show, is a wonderfully old style, rich watch. I wear it on the wristband for formal events, or with a delicate Nomos cordovan tie for regular use. The back dial is matte dark with pilot-style markings and brilliant hands and files; I found an elastic tie with vertical sections that reverberation those for the situation, completely changing the appearance of the watch into something a lot sportier – in the manner a Royal Oak is both refined and tough, I suppose.
There’s likewise the feeling of event you get while tying it on, on the grounds that the Reverso is actually a piece of watchmaking history. Like all the other things – vehicles particularly – it’s gotten fatter and more complicated, at the end of the day the DNA stays flawless, and that is the thing that’s important.
What about the scratches? All things considered, I’ll go with the way of thinking that says they are a sign of patina and character. (Be that as it may, I’ll actually keep a Cape Cod helpful for the occasions when it gets too much!)
The creator/photographic artist at work