The 1815 was my first very good quality piece, obtained back in 2003. I actually recall the restless evenings and snapshots of uncertainty throughout the choice cycle. A few different pieces were additionally in contention: the JLC Master Geographic; the Chopard 1.98; one of the Patek Calatravas; the AP Jules Audemars Automatic.
All pictures in this article can be tapped on for bigger versions
So for what reason did I go with the 1815 eventually? A lot of reasons, really. Initial introductions, the case had a weight that misrepresented its size – and none of the others very figured out how to pass on a similar impression of thickness. At that point there was the dial tone; a grand dull blue that under certain lights was electric, and under others, practically dark. (The rest had plain dark or white/silver dials). Also, obviously there’s the development: at a certain point, I had the entirety of the watches on their backs, and the Lange just shimmered. It stuck out. As far as I might be concerned, it shouted extraordinary – I think it was the screwed chatons that did it.
I wore this watch pretty much consistently for various years. During that time, numerous subtleties in the plan got evident – canny contacts that one just notification and appreciates in the wake of investing energy with the watch. For example, the way that you can generally peruse the specific chance to the closest second – something impractical with all watches! There’s likewise the auxiliary crown tube that both keeps dust from entering the case, and gives the crown an unfathomably strong, secure feel; the little stabilizer on the second hand to lessen unbalanced wear on the development train.
And those screwed chatons are not only there for enrichment. With a ¾ plate, they’re important to help reassembly; the plate can be set up and the chatons added subsequently, permitting the watchmaker to find each pinion at his relaxation separately. The ¾ plate itself is both a pleasant verifiable touch, and a decent piece of designing – it builds unbending nature of the development, which should help timekeeping and long haul strength. Not that this watch requires it; the case is developed as an enormous strong roll of gold. Indeed, even the pin lock is planned so that it twists the tie at all conceivable method to safeguard its life span. (Valuable, when a substitution lash costs as much as some whole watches.)
At some point, I went to an occasion facilitated by a neighborhood AD where an etcher from Lange was available. I needed to confirm the industrious web gossip that every etcher’s work is novel and particular, so I passed across my watch to him. He examined the equilibrium cockerel briefly, gazed toward me and said ‘this is one of mine!’.
There is no new or special innovation in the actual development – it is essentially an especially professional piece of traditional watchmaking, from the swan neck controller to the old equilibrium with balancing screws. It twists by hand with an extremely smooth, damped, rich feel; the sliding snap configuration implies that you don’t feel the wrench activity of the origin wheel like on other physically twisted watches, yet it implies that you need to recollect to backwind the crown a turn subsequent to arriving at the cutoff to soothe tension on the snap. All things considered, an extremely charming experience.
My watch ran for around 45 hours, timing about +3s/day all things considered. I possibly reset it when I exchanged watches or changed time zones.
You’re likely going to be astounded to discover that in 2009, I sold the watch. Why? Truly, I had a feeling that it was the ideal opportunity for a change; maybe an ideal opportunity to let another person appreciate the piece. I supplanted it with a JLC Reverso Grand GMT ( explored here ). In spite of the fact that I enormously appreciate the Reverso, I have almost certainly that a few years later, I’ll presumably sell that as well, so I can appreciate another piece. Who knows, it likely could be another Lange. MT
More data on Lange & Sohne: